Brewing with the Fellow Stagg [X] Dripper – Espresso advert Astra

Picture by way of Noé Aubin-Cadot.

Reminder: as an Amazon Affiliate I earn small commissions from qualifying purchases made during the Amazon hyperlinks underneath. I don’t have any affiliation to Fellow and don’t obtain any advantages from posting this.

If you’re a standard reader, you may have observed me writing a bit of concerning the Fellow Stagg drippers. Six months in the past, Fellow presented me their Stagg EKG 0.6L kettle for me to incorporate it in my research of kettle streams, and so they integrated an sudden bonus within the package deal: their Stagg [XF] dripper. I were brewing handiest V60s for greater than a 12 months at that time, and I didn’t in point of fact search to check out different dripper geometries. On the other hand, the Stagg instantly intrigued me with its design. For starters, this can be a flat-bottom dripper, and springs with prepleated filters very similar to Kalita filters, however produced by way of Fellow.

As you almost certainly know, I love to swirl the dripper between each kettle pour, and the bottom design of the Stagg drippers doesn’t make this simple. Thankfully, the rubber ring on the backside of the dripper may also be taken off simply, however even with out it, swirling is a bit of awkward for the reason that dripper can capsize. I discovered that the bottom of my Olivewood Hario V60 labored completely if I saved the rubber ring on and positioned the dripper at the Olivewood base:

I do know the Olivewood is moderately dear particularly if you’re simply going to make use of the bottom, however I don’t find out about a less expensive choice these days. I’m positive a few of it’s essential to repair this with Three-D printers!

In spite of those minor hurdles, I used to be instantly happy after I first brewed with the Stagg. My brews appeared noticeably sweeter than the ones I made with the V60, the usage of the similar espresso and grind measurement. Something I didn’t like concerning the Stagg [XF] is that I wanted to make use of much more water to pre-rinse the filters as a result of they’re so much taller. They’re so tall that now not pre-rinsing them moderately or with sufficient water led to them to depart a slight papery style within the cup. That is the one time I’ve ever spotted this with bleached filters, however additionally they weigh much more than standard pourover filters. Fairly strangely, they didn’t impart a nasty style in any respect, however I favor my espresso untainted. The Stagg [XF] dripper may be moderately tall and slim, and this makes it tougher to regulate how and the place your kettle movement lands at the slurry. I discussed that to Fellow, and so they instantly despatched me their Stagg [X]!

Seems now not handiest I most popular the Stagg [X] over the [XF], I most popular it such a lot over the V60 that I handiest alternated between the 2 drippers for a dozen brews, after which I switched to the usage of solely the Stagg [X] ever since. Six months and greater than 400 brews later, I’m in spite of everything in a position to put in writing about this.

The explanation why I favor the Stagg [X] brews over the V60 is unassuming: I favor the style of the espresso it brews. As I discussed, I in finding it sweeter and no more bitter. I believe that is led to by way of two issues: a better slurry temperature because of the easier thermal insulation, and a extra even drift during the complete espresso mattress that ends up in a extra even extraction. I examined the slurry temperature with my Okay-type Thermoworks temperature logger, by way of striking 100 mL of scorching water in numerous drippers and staring at how the temperature evolves when the drift holes are blocked:

As the information display, the Stagg [X] slurry used to be certainly reasonably hotter and extra strong than the V60 slurry. I attempted evaluating the Stagg [X] to the V60 with the very same parameters, specifically a 25.0 grams dose, a 1:17 ratio, 4 pours with the very same timing and drift price, the similar Hario tabless V60 filters and ColorFull Espresso Corp‘s scrumptious Solar Blood decaf. I used a 210°F (99°C) kettle temperature with the Plastic V60, and a 202°F (94°C) kettle temperature with the Stagg [X], as earlier experiments confirmed that this used to be the right way to download a mean slurry temperature of 191°F (88°C) all over the brew, in each circumstances. I measured the focus of the brews the usage of a VST refractometer and located 1.34% TDS for each brews, comparable to an moderate extraction yield of precisely 19.9% in each circumstances (remember that this isn’t low for a decaffeinated espresso). The V60 brew had moderately an extended brew time, on the other hand, clocking in at 5:40 when put next with 5:01 for the Stagg [X]. This longer brew time isn’t too sudden, because the V form of the V60 makes the similar dose of espresso taller. The ensuing brews tasted moderately other: the V60 brew had nearly no sweetness and had a bit of of an ashy aftertaste most definitely because of some areas of the espresso mattress getting over extracted, and the Stagg [X] brew used to be jammy, candy and fruity. This comparability is attention-grabbing to me, as it way there’s something extra to only a higher thermal insulation with the Stagg [X], regardless of the 2 brews having the similar moderate extraction yield. I believe that understanding what espresso dose will get me the similar shorter brew time with the V60 would disclose it to have a reasonably decrease moderate extraction yield.

This used to be excellent timing, as a result of I used to be pondering so much about dripper geometries to put in writing the percolation bankruptcy of my upcoming espresso e book The Physics of Clear out Espresso, and I used to be progressively finding that water does now not drift in any respect like I anticipated or needed for when brewing with the V60. Via concurrently measuring my pour price and the drip price of the V60 with two scales attached to my buddy Francisco’s internet app, I used to be in a position to infer the peak of the water within the dripper at each second of the brew, in addition to the hydraulic resistance of the entire dripper, filter out and low mattress gadget. Hydraulic resistance is a amount that represents how a lot the blended results of the dripper, filter out and low mattress are fighting the water from flowing down very speedy. With out going too deep into the weeds (that is what the e book will probably be for!), those knowledge in point of fact satisfied me unquestionably that some vital quantity of water used to be bypassing the espresso mattress, i.e. flowing round it somewhat than during the espresso.

This impact is typically referred to as bypass, and has been mentioned so much within the espresso neighborhood. I used to be up to now skeptical about it and I assumed that little or no water bypassed across the V60 mattress, as a result of I had by no means observed laborious knowledge to beef up the theory. I don’t blame the espresso neighborhood for that, as a result of it isn’t simple to measure this impact as it should be. Some counsel to all the time pour on the heart of the slurry to forestall bypass, however that is like deciding to battle in opposition to the sea by way of punching it. Irrespective of the place you pour water, it’s going to in finding the trail of least resistance and drift most commonly there. Pouring on the heart of the slurry and hoping to keep away from bypass is thus so much like pouring on the heart of a eating plate to forestall water from spilling out. As quickly because the water stage will get prime sufficient, it’s going to drift across the plate up to it likes. The similar is right with the V60, and maximum different drippers. If the extent of water turns into prime sufficient that it touches some loose paper filter out that doesn’t stick carefully in opposition to a dripper wall, a few of this water will move during the filter out, irrespective of the place you pour.

Bypass isn’t essentially a horrible factor when water flows totally across the espresso mattress: it’s going to simply make your beverage extra diluted. You would have to pour extra water to succeed in the similar moderate extraction yield when put next with a brew the place water does now not bypass, and the ensuing cup would thus be much less concentrated. The phase that I in finding fascinating in any respect is the place water too can drift via handiest a part of the espresso mattress, after which get away halfway. When this occurs, much less water will succeed in the ground of the espresso mattress, and the ground will stay much less extracted than the outside layers of the espresso mattress. That is the place dripper geometry turns into necessary: a conical dripper will permit water to flee from the center of the espresso mattress, while a cylindrical dripper received’t permit this as simply.

You could suppose {that a} answer by contrast downside could be to agitate the espresso mattress very deeply in a conical dripper, to make certain that the ground is easily extracted. You wouldn’t be unsuitable in any respect, however this brings out different headaches: such deep agitation will permit very positive espresso powder to be dislodged extra simply from the bigger espresso debris, and this migration of the fines can totally clog the paper filter out. As a result of clogging has a tendency to depart only a few spots of decrease resistance within the filter out, a big fraction of the water will probably be compelled to drift there, and this asymmetric drift will typically purpose small areas of the espresso mattress to transform over-extracted, and can lead to harsher and extra astringent brews. I believe this may also have an effect on brew readability, for a similar explanation why, despite the fact that I’ve now not verified this with measurements but.

The usage of smaller pours is but every other option to reduce bypass. This may occasionally certainly reduce the volume of water that absolutely bypasses across the espresso mattress, nevertheless it received’t save you water from bypassing halfway during the espresso mattress. This technique will even decrease the slurry temperature, and result in decrease moderate extraction yields and other taste profiles that I generally tend to love much less.

Some other answer might be to take away the ridges in a conical brewer, similar to the higher part of the Kono Meimon dripper. On the other hand, this creates every other factor: water will handiest drift via a small opening close to the ground of the dripper, because of this that any espresso fines liberated with the drift will probably be trapped in a smaller floor house of paper filter out. This may occasionally make the dripper extra liable to clogging, as I briefly came upon when my buddy Dan Eils despatched me a Three-D-printed ridgeless V60. If you’re skeptical of this, I recommend to check out an eye-opening experiment: take a tumbler V60 dripper that doesn’t have a base on the backside, and position a paper filter out on the backside of the outlet outdoor the dripper. Use an elastic to carry it in position, then take a look at brewing espresso with this. You’re going to enjoy an incredibly gradual drift, if now not an instantaneous clogging of the filter out. This can be a great demonstration of the way the entire floor house of paper filter out in point of fact issues for clogging. Understand that handiest the filter out floor that isn’t pressed in opposition to a cast floor counts, as a result of water can’t move during the filter out successfully in other places.

In different phrases, the V60 sacrifices some evenness of extraction (the ground of the espresso mattress is tougher to extract neatly), in trade for a extra simply maintained drift of water and no more clogging. That is true as it has an overly huge loose filter out house in comparison to the quantity of the espresso mattress. Flat-bottom drippers face the problem of getting much less loose filter out floor for every gram of espresso.

If you happen to consider it, you’ll understand that this may be why each the Kalita and the Stagg have ribs on the backside. They’re there to boost the filter out, and save you it from collapsing into the dripper holes. If the filter out does cave in, water can handiest drift via a minuscule floor house of loose paper filter out, and it’s going to instantly clog. You will have skilled this with the Kalita: in case you then simply gently elevate the filter out, water will get started flowing once more as a result of you have got larger its loose floor dramatically.

The Stagg dripper is certainly an development over the Kalita on this appreciate, as it has extra holes and wider, extra calmly allotted ridges. On the other hand, I don’t suppose they’re deep sufficient: I’ve skilled clogging a number of occasions after I first began brewing with the Stagg. Ray Murakawa prompt striking a couple of entire espresso beans on the backside of the dripper to keep away from this. This answer works, however I didn’t in point of fact adore it as a result of it might probably simply result in an asymmetric espresso mattress and makes it tougher to get an excellent drift. Scott Rao had a pleasing concept that became out to paintings significantly better for me: reducing out a tea strainer mesh, and striking it on the backside of the dripper.

Even if I don’t suppose that is the perfect answer, it sort of feels to be one of the vital easiest choices that may be simply achieved at house. It totally fastened the problem of clogging for me after I used it with the prepleated Stagg filters. On the other hand, prepleated filters also are problematic in my opinion as a result of they nonetheless permit for some bypass, or even most definitely permit for some water to flee from the center portions of the espresso mattress, despite the fact that this may increasingly certainly now not be as a lot of a subject matter than it’s with a conical dripper. That is most definitely what driven others like Scott Rao and Matt Leberman to favor brews made with a V60 filter out this is compelled into the Stagg dripper after pre-wetting it.

This will glance messy, however it’s moderately artful. It forces the filter out to stick at the partitions of the dripper, thus minimizing bypass and supplying you with extra floor for pouring and extra quantity for water. It’s additionally now not the easiest answer as a result of it’s going to be laborious to all the time position the filter out in the very same means, and thus would possibly result in other brew occasions, and other quantities of bypass. It additionally turns into necessary to make use of a tea strainer mesh, for the reason that removing of bypass implies that the dripper will transform much more liable to clogging. I attempted to deliver additional enhancements to the filter out mesh, by way of poking it with a drill bit and inflicting it to have a “spiky” form:

The theory at the back of that is to attenuate the volume of touch between the mesh and the filter out, and subsequently building up the entire loose floor house of the filter out. I discovered that it helped with drift, particularly when the filter out is pressed in opposition to the dripper partitions. On the other hand, I didn’t get as many spikes as I would really like, and they aren’t of the similar actual top. This makes it a bit of tougher to acquire a flat espresso mattress and an excellent drift.

If you desire to use the Stagg filters and don’t thoughts the additional minute, you’ll be able to position one within the dripper as standard, pre-wet it after which press every filter out fold in opposition to the dripper with a finger till all of them adhere to the dripper wall:

I received’t move into filter out houses an excessive amount of right here (this will probably be mentioned in nice period within the e book), however the high quality of pores within the Stagg filters isn’t as nice as the ones of the Hario tabless V60 filters. The V60 filters also are so much thicker, even if the Stagg filters really feel thicker as a result of they’re simply extra inflexible. The simpler pores and larger thickness make the V60 filters extra attention-grabbing to me, however I’m a bit of troubled by way of the more serious repeatability this is led to by way of the messy filter out placement.

Here’s the recipe that I these days observe after I brew with the Stagg [X] dripper.  I don’t suppose it’s the one wonderful means to make use of it, however this has labored neatly for me over the last few months:

• Use between 22 and 26 grams of espresso (I in my view like to make use of 25 grams).
• Use a coffee-to-water ratio that fits your grinder and private desire of extraction yield as opposed to beverage power aggregate. I typically brew with 17:1.
• I like to recommend creating a nest form within the dry espresso mattress, and get started pouring within the hollow all over the bloom step. This will appear counterintuitive, however I believe this is helping getting water during the backside layers of the espresso mattress a bit of quicker even with flat-bottom drippers.
• Pour about 2.5 to a few.5 grams of water according to gram of dry espresso dose for the bloom step. You wish to have to have sufficient water that you’ll be able to instantly give the dripper a excellent swirl to make the outside of the espresso mattress even ahead of all water has dripped out.
• I take advantage of the similar grind measurement as I might for V60, and the similar pouring patterns (anything else that covers the overall floor, for instance spirals). I additionally use the similar pour top (slightly under the purpose the place it splatters), and the similar pour price of 5-6 g/s (as described right here, this is dependent upon your kettle). A number of other people identified to me that the breakup period of a kettle is lowered when pouring warmer water. I believe that is certainly true, nevertheless it doesn’t trade my advice of pouring slightly under the peak the place it splatters.
• I nonetheless use very popular water as a rule (210°F, 99°C). The one explanation why I don’t use a operating boil is to keep away from getting an risky kettle movement, and even spurting. I decrease my kettle temperature to 205°F (96°C) after I don’t know a roaster neatly, as it minimizes roastiness (burnt and sour style) when a espresso is roasted darker. I’ve gotten excellent effects with kettle temperatures as little as 190°F (88°C) when espresso used to be roasted even darker, however I generally tend to favor roasts which are neatly matched to warmer water.
• I generally tend to make use of about 4 pours after I brew with the Stagg (now not counting the bloom), somewhat than handiest two as I used to brew with the V60. The simpler warmth insulation makes this imaginable, and you’ll be compelled to try this in case you use the Stagg [X] with non-folded prepleated filters as a result of the smaller dripper quantity. I in point of fact just like the brews that this produces, nevertheless it makes it so much tougher to stay observe of pour sizes and the timing of pours, particularly for the reason that other coffees generally tend to drift at other charges. I these days get started a brand new pour on every occasion the water stage is going not up to about one inch above the espresso mattress, and I’m really not specifically nice at maintaining a tally of my pour sizes, despite the fact that I attempt to stay them round 90 grams every.
• I swirl the dripper very gently simply after each kettle pour for approximately part a 2nd (I swirl the bloom extra vigorously, and for 2-3 seconds).
• I take advantage of prepleated Stagg filters as supposed the primary time I brew a bag of espresso, with the flat tea strainer mesh. If I don’t get very lengthy brew occasions (about 3:45 or extra for me, however this is dependent upon your grinder), I can generally tend both press the filter out folds in opposition to the dripper partitions with the spiked tea strainer mesh, or use a V60 filter out with the flat tea strainer mesh. Combining the V60 filter out with the spiked mesh received’t lend a hand as a lot, for the reason that V60 filter out will cave in between the spikes anyway when it’s compelled throughout the dripper.
• Instantly take out the spent espresso and filter out and rinse the dripper and mesh. Steer clear of to let the espresso steep in there as a result of that may stain the dripper with stale espresso oils a lot quicker.

You’ll be able to discover a video of an instance brew I made right here. This espresso used to be a in point of fact great washed Ethiopian Yirgacheffe roasted by way of my buddy Andy Kires (the roaster at the back of Colorfull). I used a 25.3 grams espresso dose and 430 grams of water for a 1:17 ratio, and I received a brew with a 1.53% TDS focus, for a mean extraction yield of twenty-two.1%.

You will have guessed it from the brew information above: despite the fact that I favor the style of my Stagg [X] brews over the V60, and they generally tend to succeed in upper moderate extraction yields partly because of the upper achievable slurry temperature, I don’t download the similar stage of repeatability as I did for the V60. As I confirmed in a earlier submit, my 2-pour V60 brews have been usually repeatable inside 0.2% extraction yield, however my Stagg [X] brews have a worse balance with a bigger unfold of about 0.3—0.4% in moderate extraction yield. I’m beautiful positive that is basically because of two issues: it’s tougher to copy the mesh and filter out placement precisely, and it’s tougher to stay actual observe of extra kettle pours. This implies the V60 used to be a useful gizmo for experimenting, and it allowed me to generate many figures in response to a number of hundred repeatable brews for my e book. However now, I in point of fact revel in this stepped forward style even at the price of somewhat repeatability!

Observe: Since I launched this weblog submit on Patreon a couple of months in the past, I’ve switched to the usage of a coarser mesh on the backside of the Stagg [X], which I comprised of a pasta strainer. I additionally made a model the place I imprinted spikes by way of wrapping the mesh round a nail with pliers. I discovered that it really works easiest with the V60 filter out to make sure that you continue to get sufficient drift by way of minimizing the touch between even the mesh and the paper filter out.

Observe {that a} coarse however flat mesh works really well with the Stagg [X] filters too. I in finding this mixture helpful with coffees that another way choke the V60 filter out or another way take much more than 5 mins to brew.

I’ve additionally won a number of questions on how I position the V60 filters within the Stagg [X]; I now merely position the dry filter out on best of the dripped (with the purpose of the V form status in on the backside of the dripper) after which run some tap water within the heart. The tap force collapses the filter out, and I lend a hand it collapse with my hand till the filter out sticks to the partitions neatly. I then press any folds to the partitions to, like this: